I make it a practice of reading a book during the season of lent around the subject of spiritual disciplines (or practices if you prefer). This year I am reading Scot McKight's book "Fasting". I thought I would share some of my thoughts and learnings on this blog. Feel free to join the conversation by posting your comments at the end of each post.
I'll begin with Scot's thesis that "Fasting is the natural, inevitable response of a person to a grievous sacred moment in life".
Right from the start Scot has helped broaden my understanding of fasting to something much more profound about how God has made us. I have normally approached fasting as purely a spiritual discipline. I used fasting as a way to train my body and soul from slavery from being controlled by its appetites. It was a discipline of abstinence, an exercise, something unnatural so that I could then live more naturally, more free. This I think is still true as a discipline but his thesis immediately fascinated me. The claim that fasting is a natural response resonates with me, not because I have thought this to be true, I had no idea, but it is as though my soul responded to a deep reality that I am disconnected from. I can only describe it as if my soul has been waiting for me to discover something that the rest of me didn't know was lost.
I have been aware for a long time of the effects of a dualistic western society that splits body and soul on my understanding of the Christian faith. But I never had made the connection with fasting. Scot makes this point "the urge to fast will not return among Christians until we understand the connection of body and soul." Fascinating.
I'll do at least one post a week through lent on this book, and I'll close this first post with a couple questions. What are your perceptions of fasting? How does Scot's thesis strike you? Shalom.
The link to Scot's book is to the right in my what I am currently reading list.
Recent Comments